Feasibility, safety, efficacy and potential scaling-up of sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment in Central and West Africa: (TAC ANRS 12311 trial).

Access to Hepatis C treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa is a clinical, public health and ethical concern. The multi-country open-label trial TAC ANRS 12311 allowed assessing the feasibility, safety, efficacy of a specific care model of HCV treatment and retreatment in patients with hepatitis C in Sub Saharan Africa. Between November 2015 and March 2017, with follow-up until mid 2019, treatment-naïve patients with HCV without decompensated cirrhosis or liver cancer were recruited to receive 12 week-treatment with either sofosbuvir + ribavirin (HCV genotype 2) or sofosbuvir + ledipasvir (genotype 1 or 4) and retreatment with sofosbuvir + velpatasvir + voxilaprevir in case of virological failure. The primary outcome was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12). Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, safety and SVR12 in patients who were retreated due to non-response to first-line treatment. The model of care relied on both viral load assessment and educational sessions to increase patient awareness, adherence and health literacy. The study recruited 120 participants, 36 HIV-co-infected, and 14 cirrhotic. Only one patient discontinued treatment because of return to home country. Neither death nor severe adverse event occurred. SVR12 was reached in 107 patients (89%): (90%) in genotype 1 or 2, and 88% in GT-4. All retreated patients (n = 13) reached SVR12. HCV treatment is highly acceptable, safe and effective under this model of care. Implementation research is now needed to scale up point-of-care HCV testing and SVR assessment, along with community involvement in patient education, to achieve HCV elimination in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Determine the enzymatic kinetic characteristics of CYP3A4 variants utilizing artemether-lumefantrine.

Artemether-lumefantrine is an artemisinin-based combination therapy for the treatment of malaria, which are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. Therapeutic difference caused by gene polymorphisms of CYP3A4 may lead to uncertain adverse side effects or treatment failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CYP3A4 gene polymorphism on artemether-lumefantrine metabolism in vitro. Enzyme kinetics assay was performed using recombinant human CYP3A4 cell microsomes. The analytes, dihydroartimisinin and desbutyl-lumefantrine, were detected by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The results demonstrated that compared to CYP3A4.1, the intrinsic clearance of CYP3A4.4, 5, 9, 16, 18, 23, 24, 28, 31-34 significantly reduced for artemether (58.5%-93.3%), and CYP3A4.17 almost loss catalytic activity. Simultaneously, CYP3A4.5, 14, 17, 24 for lumefantrine were decreased by 56.1%-99.6%, and CYP3A4.11, 15, 18, 19, 23, 28, 29, 31-34 for lumefantrine was increased by 51.7%-296%. The variation in clearance rate indicated by molecular docking could be attributed to the disparity in the binding affinity of artemether and lumefantrine with CYP3A4. The data presented here have enriched our understanding of the effect of CYP3A4 gene polymorphism on artemether-lumefantrine metabolizing. These findings serve as a valuable reference and provide insights for guiding the treatment strategy involving artemether-lumefantrine.

Efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate versus artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria in children in South-West Nigeria: an open-labelled randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In Nigeria, declining responsiveness to artemether-lumefantrine (AL), the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) of choice since 2005, has been reported. Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a newer fixed-dose ACT recently prequalified by the WHO for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. However, PA data from the Nigerian pediatric population is scarce. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of PA and AL using the WHO 28-day anti-malarial therapeutic efficacy study protocol in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria, were compared. METHODS: In an open-labelled, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 172 children aged 3-144 months with a history of fever and microscopically confirmed uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in southwest Nigeria. Enrollees were randomly assigned to receive PA or AL at standard dosages according to body weight for 3 days. Venous blood was obtained for hematology, blood chemistry, and liver function tests on days 0, 3, 7, and 28 as part of the safety evaluation. RESULTS: 165 (95.9%) of the enrolled individuals completed the study. About half (52.3%; 90/172) of enrollees were male. Eighty-seven (50.6%) received AL, while 85 (49.4%) received PA. Day 28, adequate clinical and parasitological response for PA was 92.7% [(76/82) 95% CI 83.1, 95.9] and 71.1% [(59/83) 95% CI 60.4, 79.9] for AL (0.001). Fever and parasite clearance were similar in both groups. Two of six and eight of 24 parasite recurrences were observed among PA- and AL-treated children, respectively. PCR-corrected Day-28 cure rates for PA were 97.4% (76/78) and 88.1% (59/67) for AL (= 0.04) in the per-protocol population after new infections were censored. Hematological recovery at day 28 was significantly better among PA-treated patients (34.9% 2.8) compared to those treated with AL (33.1% 3.0) (0.002). Adverse events in both treatment arms were mild and similar to the symptoms of malaria infection. Blood chemistry and liver function tests were mostly within normal limits, with an occasional marginal rise. CONCLUSION: PA and AL were well-tolerated. PA was significantly more efficacious than AL in both the PCR-uncorrected and PCR-corrected per-protocol populations during this study. The results of this study support the inclusion of PA in the anti-malarial treatment guidelines in Nigeria. RETROSPECTIVE TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05192265.

Safety and therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria at Shecha health centre, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: In 2004, Ethiopia adopted artemether-lumefantrine (AL, Coartem®) as first-line treatment for the management of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Continuous monitoring of AL therapeutic efficacy is crucial in Ethiopia, as per the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of AL in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum infection. METHODS: A 28 day onearm, prospective evaluation of the clinical and parasitological response to AL was conducted at Shecha Health Centre, Arba Minch town, Southern Ethiopia. Patients were treated with six-dose regimen of AL over three days and monitored for 28 days with clinical and laboratory assessments. Participant recruitment and outcome classification was done in accordance with the 2009 WHO methods for surveillance of anti-malarial drug efficacy guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 88 study participants were enrolled and 69 of them completed the study with adequate clinical and parasitological response. Two late parasitological failures were observed, of which one was classified as a recrudescence by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCRcorrected cure rate was 98.6% (95% CI 92.3-100). AL demonstrated a rapid parasite and fever clearance with no parasitaemia on day 2 and febrile cases on day 3. Gametocyte clearance was complete by day three. No serious adverse events were reported during the 28 days follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy and good safety profile of AL. This suggests the continuation of AL as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. Periodic therapeutic efficacy studies and monitoring of markers of resistance are recommended for early detection of resistant parasites.

A Phase 2 open label study of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in subjects with hepatitis B virus infection.

Retrospective data showed that when we administered ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) to patients with hepatitis B and C coinfection, there was a modest reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Therefore, we hypothesize that similar HBsAg reduction can be seen in hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfected subjects. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints are the decline in HBsAg and HBV DNA at Week 12 from baseline, respectively. We conducted an open-label Phase 2 pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of LDV and/or SOF for HBV. Eligible subjects were either suppressed on antivirals (Group B) or inactive chronic HBV (Group A, C, D). Group A and B received LDV/SOF. Group C and D received SOF 400 mg and LDV 90 mg, respectively. All subjects completed the study, and all related adverse events (AEs) were mild. No discontinuations due to AEs or hepatitis flare occurred. At Week 12, HBsAg decline (log10 IU/ml) was similar between Group A (0.399) and B (0.400), less in Group C (0.207), and none in Group D, and there was HBV DNA decline in the inactive chronic HBV groups. LDV and SOF are safe and well tolerated when given to chronic hepatitis B subjects and have modest antiviral activity, particularly when given in combination.

The Impact of Extended Treatment With Artemether-lumefantrine on Antimalarial Exposure and Reinfection Risks in Ugandan Children With Uncomplicated Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa and is threatened by the emergence of artemisinin resistance. Dosing is suboptimal in young children. We hypothesized that extending AL duration will improve exposure and reduce reinfection risks. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of extended duration AL in children with malaria in high-transmission rural Uganda. Children received 3-day (standard 6-dose) or 5-day (10-dose) AL with sampling for artemether, dihydroartemisinin, and lumefantrine over 42-day clinical follow-up. Primary outcomes were (1) comparative pharmacokinetic parameters between regimens and (2) recurrent parasitemia analyzed as intention-to-treat. RESULTS: A total of 177 children aged 16 months to 16 years were randomized, contributing 227 total episodes. Terminal median lumefantrine concentrations were significantly increased in the 5-day versus 3-day regimen on days 7, 14, and 21 (P < .001). A predefined day 7 lumefantrine threshold of 280 ng/mL was strongly predictive of recurrence risk at 28 and 42 days (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimated 28-day (51% vs 40%) and 42-day risk (75% vs 68%) did not significantly differ between 3- and 5-day regimens. No significant toxicity was seen with the extended regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the duration of AL was safe and significantly enhanced overall drug exposure in young children but did not lead to significant reductions in recurrent parasitemia risk in our high-transmission setting. However, day 7 levels were strongly predictive of recurrent parasitemia risk, and those in the lowest weight-band were at higher risk of underdosing with the standard 3-day regimen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03453840.

Artemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Grande Comore island: an open-label, non-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Malaria significantly rebounded in 2018 in the Comoros; this created an urgent need to conduct clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of artemisinin and its derivatives. METHODS: An open-label, non-randomised controlled trial of artemisinin-piperaquine (AP) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) was conducted in Grande Comore island from June 2019 to January 2020. A total of 238 uncomplicated falciparum malaria cases were enrolled and divided 1:1 into two treatments. The primary endpoint was the 42-day adequate clinical and parasitological responses (ACPR). Secondary endpoints were parasitaemia and fever clearance at day 3, gametocytes and tolerability. RESULTS: The 42-day ACPR before and after PCR correction were 91.43% (95% CI 83.93-95.76%) and 98.06% (95% CI 92.48-99.66%) for AP treatment, respectively, and 96.00% (95% CI 88.17-98.14%) and 98.97% (95% CI 93.58-99.95%) for AL treatment, respectively. Complete clearance of the parasitaemia and fever for both groups was detected on day 3. Gametocytes disappeared on day 21 in the AP group and on day 2 in AL group. Specifically, the adverse reactions were mild in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that AP and AL maintained their high efficacy and tolerance in the Comoros. Nonetheless, asymptomatic malaria infections bring new challenges to malaria control.

Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria among Children in Western Kenya, 2016 to 2017.

Antimalarial resistance threatens global malaria control efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends routine antimalarial efficacy monitoring through a standardized therapeutic efficacy study (TES) protocol. From June 2016 to March 2017, children with uncomplicated P. falciparum mono-infection in Siaya County, Kenya were enrolled into a standardized TES and randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 3-day course of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Efficacy outcomes were measured at 28 and 42 days. A total of 340 children were enrolled. All but one child cleared parasites by day 3. PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) was 88.5% (95% CI: 80.9 to 93.3%) at day 28 for AL and 93.0% (95% CI: 86.9 to 96.4%) at day 42 for DP. There were 9.6 times (95% CI: 3.4 to 27.2) more reinfections in the AL arm compared to the DP arm at day 28, and 3.1 times (95% CI: 1.9 to 4.9) more reinfections at day 42. Both AL and DP were efficacious (per WHO 90% cutoff in the confidence interval) and well tolerated for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in western Kenya, but AL efficacy appears to be waning. Further efficacy monitoring for AL, including pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended.

Safety and Efficacy of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Treatment-Naïve Children without and with Comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a crucial health problem in children that greatly influences their quality of life. Many efforts have been directed toward investing in effective drugs with a high safety profile and oral administration for better compliance. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the safety of a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus drug efficacy and sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation. METHOD: One tablet (90 mg ledipasvir, 400 mg sofosbuvir) was administered to treatment-naïve children aged 12-18 years weighing at least 35 kg with chronic HCV infection for 6 months, genotype 4. Patients were divided into 2 groups, (1) without comorbidities (24 patients) and (2) with comorbidities (26 patients). RESULTS: At the end of the therapy, all patients (100%) had SVR and a significant reduction of liver enzymes with mild tolerable side effects. CONCLUSION: Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination is a safe and highly effective therapeutic option in Egyptian children aged ≥ 12 years, with chronic HCV infection, genotype 4, either without or with comorbidities.

Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C and Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: In children with hematological malignancies, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been associated with more rapid liver disease progression and higher risk of malignancy relapse due to chemotherapy interruption. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12weeks in these patients. METHODS: In a phase 2, open-label study, at one site in Egypt, patients ages 12-<18years with chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection undergoing maintenance chemotherapy for hematological malignancies received ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90 mg/400 mg) once daily for 12weeks. The efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events and clinical and laboratory data, including HCV flares defined as alanine aminotransferase >3-fold increase from Day 1 and HCV RNA elevation >1 × log10 from Day 1. RESULTS: Of the 19 adolescents enrolled and treated, median age was 14 years (range 12-17), 84% (16/19) were male, and all had HCV genotype 4 and were HCV treatment naive. All patients completed treatment and achieved SVR12 (19/19, 100%, 95% confidence interval, 82-100). Common adverse events were pyrexia (5/19, 26%), diarrhea (4/19, 21%), and headache (4/19, 21%). Three patients experienced serious adverse events of pneumonia (two patients), and osteoarthritis and diarrhea (one patient); none were considered related to study drug. No patient experienced HCV flares. CONCLUSIONS: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was well-tolerated and efficacious in adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 4 and leukemia undergoing maintenance chemotherapy. These data support the use of this interferon and ribavirin-free regimen in adolescents with hematological malignancies.

Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Adult Patients with ß- Thalassemia Major: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with thalassemia have a lifelong need for blood transfusion, which makes them more risky to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Iron overload and chronic HCV are considered risk factors for patients with thalassemia to develop liver insults. The aim of the present study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in the treatment of chronic HCV infection in Egyptian adult patients with ß- thalassemia major. METHODS: A retrospective study included 53 patients with ß-thalassemia major with chronic HCV treated with sofosbuvir (400 mg) and ledipasvir (90 mg) as a single pill fixed-dose combination once daily for 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. RESULTS: SVR was achieved in 96.23% of patients. 47.17% of patients had minor side effects. There was a significant reduction in ALT, AST, and serum ferritin 12 weeks post-therapy. There was an insignificant change in hemoglobin level or blood transfusion requirement 12 weeks posttherapy. There was no change in iron chelators doses throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir regimen seems to be safe and highly effective in the treatment of chronic HCV in patients with ß-thalassemia major.

Phase 1A/1B dose-escalation and -expansion study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, food effects and antitumor activity of pamiparib in advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Pamiparib, a PARP1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models. METHODS: This Phase 1A/1B dose-escalation/dose-expansion study enrolled adults (≥18 years) with advanced/metastatic cancer. The dose-escalation phase evaluated the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics; the dose-expansion phase evaluated the antitumor activity and food effects. RESULTS: Patients (N = 101) were enrolled in dose-escalation (n = 64) and dose-expansion (n = 37). During BID dose-escalation, dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 2 nausea (n = 1, 40 mg; n = 1, 80 mg); Grade 2 nausea and Grade 2 anorexia (n = 1, 120 mg), Grade 2 nausea, Grade 3 fatigue and Grade 3 paraesthesia (n = 1, 120 mg); MTD was 80 mg BID and RP2D was 60 mg BID. Common adverse events (AEs) were nausea (69.3%), fatigue (48.5%) and anaemia (35.6%); the most common Grade ≥3 AE was anaemia (24.8%). There was a dose-proportional increase in pamiparib exposure; no food effects on pharmacokinetics were observed. In the efficacy-evaluable population (n = 77), objective response rate (ORR) was 27.3% (95% CI, 17.7-38.6%). Median duration of response was 14.9 months (95% CI, 8.7-26.3). In the epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)-evaluable population (n = 51), ORR was 41.2% (95% CI, 27.6-55.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Pamiparib was tolerated with manageable AEs, and antitumor activity was observed in patients with EOC. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02361723.

Fatal case of delayed-onset haemolytic anaemia after oral artemether-lumefantrine.

Artemisinin derivatives are used globally in the management of falciparum malaria. Postartemisinin delayed haemolysis (PADH) is a recognised adverse event contributing to severe anaemia. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first recorded fatal case of PADH. A 60-year-old woman presented with two episodes of collapse at home and feeling generally unwell. She had recently been treated for uncomplicated falciparum malaria 1 month prior with artemether 80 mg/lumefantrine 480 mg in Congo. Her results on admission revealed an anaemia (haemoglobin 43 g/L), raised lactate dehydrogenase and positive direct antiglobulin test that suggested an intravascular haemolytic process. She made a capacitous decision to refuse blood products in line with her personal beliefs. Despite best supportive treatment, she did not survive. This case highlights the importance of postartemisinin follow-up and should encourage discussion and careful consideration of its use in the context of lack of access to/patient refusal of blood products.

Factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life and their OR of patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy. METHODS: The subjects were 141 outpatients who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy under a diagnosis of genotype I chronic hepatitis C or Child-Pugh A compensated cirrhosis at Hitachi General Hospital. The patient background before ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy, laboratory data and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores during ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy were investigated. The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire consists of 29 questions, and the mean value is calculated as the overall score through a 7-step assessment by patients. Using two divisions: a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 (symptoms are present) and that of 7 (no symptoms), as objective variables, patients with a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 were defined as having a reduced quality of life. Independent factors significantly associated with a reduction in the quality of life were extracted using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Based on the multivariate analysis, an alanine aminotransferase level of ≥23 U/L (OR: 4.380, 95% CI: 1.394 to 13.756) was extracted as an independent factor associated with a reduction in the quality of life (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: An increase in the baseline level of alanine aminotransferase was found to play a role in the reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

Occupational exposure and markers of genetic damage, systemic inflammation and lung function: a Danish cross-sectional study among air force personnel.

Air force ground crew personnel are potentially exposed to fuels and lubricants, as raw materials, vapours and combustion exhaust emissions, during operation and maintenance of aircrafts. This study investigated exposure levels and biomarkers of effects for employees at a Danish air force military base. We enrolled self-reported healthy and non-smoking employees (n = 79) and grouped them by exposure based on job function, considered to be potentially exposed (aircraft engineers, crew chiefs, fuel operators and munition specialists) or as reference group with minimal occupational exposure (avionics and office workers). We measured exposure levels to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs) by silicone bands and skin wipes (PAHs only) as well as urinary excretion of PAH metabolites (OH-PAHs). Additionally, we assessed exposure levels of ultrafine particles (UFPs) in the breathing zone for specific job functions. As biomarkers of effect, we assessed lung function, plasma levels of acute phase inflammatory markers, and genetic damage levels in peripheral blood cells. Exposure levels of total PAHs, OPEs and OH-PAHs did not differ between exposure groups or job functions, with low correlations between PAHs in different matrices. Among the measured job functions, the UFP levels were higher for the crew chiefs. The exposure level of the PAH fluorene was significantly higher for the exposed group than the reference group (15.9 ± 23.7 ng/g per 24 h vs 5.28 ± 7.87 ng/g per 24 h, p = 0.007), as was the OPE triphenyl phosphate (305 ± 606 vs 19.7 ± 33.8 ng/g per 24 h, p = 0.011). The OPE tris(1,3-dichlor-2-propyl)phosphate had a higher mean in the exposed group (60.7 ± 135 ng/g per 24 h) compared to the reference group (8.89 ± 15.7 ng/g per 24 h) but did not reach significance. No evidence of effects for biomarkers of systemic inflammation, genetic damage or lung function was found. Overall, our biomonitoring study show limited evidence of occupational exposure of air force ground crew personnel to UFPs, PAHs and OPEs. Furthermore, the OH-PAHs and the assessed biomarkers of early biological effects did not differ between exposed and reference groups.

Pamiparib: First Approval.

Pamiparib (PARTRUVIX™; BeiGene Ltd.) is a selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1 and PARP2) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of various cancers. Based on the results from the pivotal phase II portion of a phase I/II trial (NCT03333915) pamiparib was recently approved in China for the treatment of germline BRCA mutation-associated recurrent advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer previously treated with two or more lines of chemotherapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of pamiparib leading to this first approval.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir in a hemodialysis patient: a case report.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in chronic hemodialysis patients remains an issue of great concern for nephrologists. In 2008 the kidney disease improving global outcomes working group suggested the use of pegylated interferon in end stage kidney disease patients treated by dialysis. Since then, series and some clinical trials on different direct-acting antiviral agents have shown better efficacy and tolerance than interferon-based regimens. Data on the efficacy, tolerance and the right dose of sofosbuvir in this population are still unclear. We report a case of chronic HCV genotype 1b infection in a 47-year-old patient on maintenance hemodialysis successfully treated by a combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. Evolution was marked by the complete regression of the hepatic cytolysis, a complete and sustained virologic response with HCV viral load undetectable for a 24 months follow-up period. No adverse reaction was found. The treatment of HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis is possible with sofosbuvir based regimens with a good efficacy/safety ratio in the absence of current recommended drugs for patients with eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2. The prescription of sofosbuvir should be encouraged amongst this population in this setting.

Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 With and Without Hematological Disorders: Virological Efficacy and Impact on Liver Stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Egypt has the highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Anti-HCV antibodies were detectable in 3% of children in Upper Egypt. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for chronic HCV genotype 4 in adolescents with/without hematological disorders and to determine the effect of sustained virological response (SVR) on liver stiffness. METHODS: Sixty-five adolescents were recruited. There were 3 patient groups: group 1, 44 treatment-naive without hematological disorders; group 2, 6 previously treated; and group 3, 15 treatment-naive with hematological disorders. All patients received sofosbuvir 400 mg/ledipasvir 90 mg per day for 12 weeks. Serum HCV RNA levels were measured before treatment, at week 12, and at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Liver stiffness and the aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) score were estimated at baseline and at SVR12. RESULTS: SVR12 was 100%. At SVR12, there was a significant improvement in liver stiffness in all groups. The APRI score showed significant improvements in groups 1 and 3 (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively). The treatment was well tolerated, with minimal and self-limited side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of chronic HCV in adolescents using ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was effective, with a cure rate (at SVR12) of 100%. Significant improvement in liver stiffness was found in all groups.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in Japan.

As patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) tend to be older and/or have advanced liver disease in Japan, real-world data are needed to evaluate safe and effective treatment options. The study aim was to assess safety and effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in a real-world cohort of Japanese patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection overall and by patient subgroups: elderly, compensated cirrhotic, advanced fibrotic and those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A large prospective observational study was conducted, enrolling adult patients treated for HCV GT1 infection with LDV/SOF at clinical sites across Japan. Patients were observed for safety outcomes during and 4 weeks after treatment, and for sustained virologic response at 12-weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Incidence rates (IRs) of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs (SADRs) and SVR12 rates were assessed overall and by subgroups. ADR and SADR IRs were low (2.26 and 0.17 per 100 person-months, respectively) and did not significantly differ in elderly patients or those with presence of compensated cirrhosis, worsening fibrosis or HCC. SVR12 rates were high overall (98.5%) and across subgroups investigated (≥94%), including patients who were elderly (98.2%), treatment-experienced (97.6%), advanced fibrotic (≥95.8%), had existing NS5A resistance-associated substitutions reported pre-treatment (95.0%), compensated cirrhosis (95.7%), HCC (94.0%) and other chronic liver diseases (96.1%). In this large, real-world observational study of Japanese patients with HCV GT1 infection, LDV/SOF treatment resulted in low incidence of adverse events, with high real-world effectiveness, even among patients with potentially higher risks of adverse safety outcomes and treatment failure.

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir in Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotypes 1, 3, and 4: A Real-world Study.

OBJECTIVES: Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for the treatment of children and adolescents (at least 3 years of age) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1, 3, and 4 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF/LDV in adolescents (12 to <18 years old) with CHC in the real-world setting. METHODS: Prospective, open-label, multicentre study involving 12 Italian centres. Patients received the fixed-dose combination of SOF/LDV (400/90 mg) once daily ± ribavirin as per EMA approval and recommendations. The key efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) as per intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed by adverse events and clinical/laboratory data. RESULTS: Seventy-eight consecutive adolescents (median age 15.2 years, range 12-17.9; girls 53.8%) were enrolled and treated between June 2018 and December 2019. Genotype distribution was as follows: genotype 1 (82.1%), 3 (2.5%), and 4 (15.4%). Seventy-six (97.4%) patients completed treatment and follow-up. Overall, SVR12 was 98.7%. One patient was lost to follow-up after 4 weeks of treatment; 1 patient completed treatment and missed the follow-up visit. No virological breakthrough or relapse were observed. No patient experienced grade 3 to 4 adverse event or serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this real-world study confirmed the high efficacy and the optimal safety profile of SOF/LDV for treatment of CHC in adolescents.